these offences.
May
be
Besides I still maintain that there are cases in which it might be against the interests of the Force to allow the matter to be taken into Court, or in which a prompt punishment such as dismissal is urgently needed, and would meet the justice of the case.
The contention between the Council and the Capt. Supt. is simply this: If a complaint by a member of the public against a member of the Force is made, he should not investigate it and decide it, but should at once refer the party aggrieved to the Police Court to take out a summons.
The Council requires him to investigate the case and to deal with it as the circumstances and justice thereof require.
A regulation passed by the Executive Council does not go beyond this, and has not imposed on him any duties or powers incompatible with any law.
With respect to the last paragraph of the Capt. Superintendent's letter, I am still of opinion that the discipline of the Force would be endangered if the members of it knew that the interference of the head would be limited to and take the form of sending the offender before a Magistrate.
The offender might have good reason to believe that the party aggrieved would not prosecute or that he could be intimidated or prevented from appearing against him.
In the third paragraph of the Memorial, the Capt. Supt. states that he would not have memorialized the Secretary of State if he had not considered the Regulation somewhat severe.
I do not quite understand what he means, but I protest against any insinuation as to my reasons for the opinion I have given in this matter.
They
these offences.
May
be
Besides I still maintain that there -caces in which it might be against the interests of the Forcato cellow
the matter to be taken into Court, or in which
a
prompt penishment such as dismissal is urgently needed, and would
of th
justice of t
the case,
contends that in all cases.
neeet the
The contention between the Council and the Capt." Sup! is simply this : _ Ife of complant by cancy of the public against a necuber of the Force he should not investigate to and decide it, but should at once refer the party aggrieved to the Police Court
to take out a eummons.
every
The Council requires him to investigate cau and to deal with it as the
The
circunustaïrew auð 3 justice there of require.
: regulation passed by the Executive
go beyond this, and
on him
Commeil does not
has not imposed
On
duties
any
any law.
powers incompatible with any
With
it de
67
With
& respect to the last paragraph. of the Capt. Superintendent's letter I am still of opinion that the discipline of the Force would be endangered if the enembers of it knew that the int
interference of the stead would be limited to and take the form of sending the offender before
Magistrate.
a
The offender might have good reason to believe that the party aggrieved would
or that he could be
ཊྛ' ... ...ནི...
not prosecute intimidated or prevented from appearing
against him:
In the third paragraph of the Memorial, the Capta Supt states that he
would not have memorialized the
Secretary of State if he had not considered
Regulation
the
some what severe
co
the
key note of a
usure passed on.
paveed on him re
I do not quite understand what he means but I protest against any insinuation, as to my reasons
the
for opinion I have given in this matter.
They
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.